Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

[Download] "People v. Conley" by Illinois Appellate Court — First District (5Th Division) Judgment Affirmed " Book PDF Kindle ePub Free

People v. Conley

๐Ÿ“˜ Read Now     ๐Ÿ“ฅ Download


eBook details

  • Title: People v. Conley
  • Author : Illinois Appellate Court — First District (5Th Division) Judgment Affirmed
  • Release Date : January 23, 1983
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 65 KB

Description

After a bench trial, defendant was convicted and sentenced to eight years for armed robbery and five years for aggravated battery. 1 He contends on appeal that (1) he was denied effective assistance of counsel; (2) the identification testimony of the complaining witness should have been suppressed; (3) his oral and written statements were involuntarily made and should have been suppressed; (4) he was not proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt; and (5) the trial court abused its discretion in imposing a sentence of eight years for armed robbery. At trial, Arlene Hrubecky testified that she was walking near Brompton and Halsted at approximately 1:30 p.m. on July 31, 1981, when a man standing near the sidewalk spoke to her. She could not distinguish what he said, and as she began to turn toward him a second man approached her from the front, took out a gun, and pointed it at her head. She heard the gun click, then the man grabbed her purse and struck her twice about the head and face with the gun. The two men ran toward a car parked on Brompton, and as they approached it the motor was started and both doors were opened. They entered the car, and as it sped away she noted that it was yellow and bore license plate number IY 7744. Immediately after the incident, she telephoned the police and gave a description of the car. She further testified that she viewed a lineup later that afternoon and identified co-defendant Andrew Kahill as the man with the gun. Defendant was in the lineup, but she could not positively identify him as the second man involved because she had seen his face for only a few seconds, although she told officers that he looked like the man who spoke to her. Subsequently, Detective Graffeo took her to a room where defendant was sitting alone, and when she entered defendant approached her and apologized for what happened, stating that he was sorry he said This is a stickup. She admitted that she was not positive defendant was the man who spoke to her at the scene until he made this statement.


PDF Books "People v. Conley" Online ePub Kindle